Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Terry Trombley's avatar

"All the words written about God cannot adequately explain Him, for His Word, the eternal logos, is beyond human understanding."

That said, it is hardly beyond the capacities of individual communion with God to impart perfect knowledge of Him, even at the expense of only a moment. and even without the exercise of the pitiful capacities of human language at all.

The quote above might seem to explain a scenario that interrupted my contemplation of God years ago as I deliberated in His presence the magnificently compelling occasion before me of communion being conducted between God and men. I had been aware from earlier encounters with God that the work of many who make their livings hawking their wares on the basis of being theologians are constrained to do so largely on the thesis that our Unfathomable God can be, and must be understood, the ignorance of their position owing to the fact that they know Him not. It was at the moment the term "theologian" entered my consciousness that so too did what seemed to be raucous laughter from Heaven. This was not laughter of amusement or of mass ridicule, but of gross incredulity which appeared to be based upon the incongruity of what was being proposed by the use of word. The proposition that men could possibly evaluate and then propose to understand by study of the writings and conclusions concerning God of other men made no sense, however intellectually or spiritually astute, these men were regarded to be. The myth that one can understand even nominally the reasoning behind the thoughts, convictions, and conclusions of our unfathomable God in this manner appeared, as it does now, to be simply ludicrous. The next thought directed me to evaluate the number chosen by Jesus and included in the original Twelve, along with their contemporaries, that might have been considered to be esteemed theologians of their day. A contemporary of Judas who appeared in a later narrative seemed to be the only candidate. The point of this interaction seemed quite clear to me. The efforts of many scholars are misguided attempts to understand the mind or actions of God often employing the conclusions of other men, or they are are based upon the insupportable assumption that we, or even the Angels are so capable when we never can or will be. However, as a result of one's genuine and personal communion with Him, our God can be known, in the biblical sense, not only intimately but perfectly in a manner which reveals without a word passing between us and Him knowledge that words have no capacity to convey. Attempts to understand God, even in the least, are always outside of the exercise of our communion with Him and based upon pride, This is a pursuit that is always entirely invulnerable to God and never at risk to Him. When from the establishment of individual communion with God emerges intimate knowledge of Him as it did in the many scholarly and non scholarly Saints of our Church, that knowledge becomes perfect as also must become the recipient but it is never, nor ever will be, complete. True knowledge of God never ceases to be consummately vulnerable to Him and His convictions, even in eternity, and the convictions that arise from our communion with God will never be less than consummately at risk only to Him. The worst deception a theologian can fall for is the misconception that they are in pursuit of knowledge of God when, failing the required establishment of a personal communion between God and them, theirs becomes a pursuit that is invulnerable to God conducted in the spiritual desert of attempting to understand of God. Basing one's work and career on this lethal misconception will always defeat every effort to gain true knowledge of our Creator in the end.

Expand full comment

No posts