Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew McGovern, Th.D.'s avatar

When I teach John 6, I always give the juxtaposition of St. Peter and the crowd. Essentially, this is our response to the mystery of the Eucharist: Either we say it is too hard and leave or we affirm our faith in Christ knowing that there is no other place to go.

I don't think Peter or the other apostles knew exactly what Christ was going to do with bread and wine not too long after this. They knew Christ and had faith in Him. So they believed that when He said He would give them His flesh and blood, He would do it. What great faith.

Expand full comment
Peter Aiello's avatar

During the discourse, Jesus was speaking of literally eating His flesh and drinking His blood, and not of bread and wine. The Last Supper occurred after the discourse. When Jesus explains it to His disciples, He tells them that the flesh profits nothing and that the spirit gives life. Many of His disciples left Him anyway. The others who remained did not fully understand His explanation in verses 62 and 63, but gave Him the benefit of the doubt because He, at least, was not speaking of literal flesh and blood. I believe that the discourse can also refer to the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. That is when eternal life became available to humanity by our receiving of Christ’s Spirit within us.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts