Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fr. Scott Bailey, C.Ss.R.'s avatar

Abuse is rampant in religious life and goes un-named and never discussed. My novice master did not allow outside spiritual directors in direct contradiction of Canon Law. His “reason” was that he had to determine fitness for vows--another contradiction of Canon Law. I revealed nothing to him other than what he wanted to hear. Further he played at being a therapist as did other formators even though they had no training other than a general psychology class. I’ve had superiors abuse the vow of obedience.

It’s not surprising that they get very few vocations and of those who make it past novitiate few stay on for final vows or ordination. Young people today can spot disfunction and hypocrisy very quickly. In twenty years they will cease to exist. Maybe then a true reform and re-founding will take place and the community will truly follow in the footsteps of Christ and St. Alphonsus.

Expand full comment
Peter Aiello's avatar

Convents can be run as cults because they also want people who will be obedient to them and their rules. What better way is there for this to happen than to require a vow of obedience from their members? Then there is the inevitable guilt associated with breaking a vow if one chooses to disobey. IBLP twists Scripture to promote its version of obedience which also produces guilt in those who would choose to disobey.

Beating you down until you break is a false path to holiness. The whole itinerary is a false path to holiness.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts